<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deja Vu all over again: climate worries of today also happened in the 20&#8217;s and 30&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/</link>
	<description>Commentary on puzzling things in life, nature, science, technology, and recent news by Anthony Watts</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 09:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Polar Bears listed as protected - now comes the lawsuits &#171; Watts Up With That?</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-14571</link>
		<dc:creator>Polar Bears listed as protected - now comes the lawsuits &#171; Watts Up With That?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-14571</guid>
		<description>[...] get the thriving polar bear listed as a protected species. Never mind the fact that the arctic has melted before in the last 100 years. See the news release from the Department of the Interior [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] get the thriving polar bear listed as a protected species. Never mind the fact that the arctic has melted before in the last 100 years. See the news release from the Department of the Interior [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoi Polloi</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-13996</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoi Polloi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-13996</guid>
		<description>citizenwells:

"The second article also appears in Global and Planetary Change and was prepared by a team of French oceanographers. As their title suggests, Berge-Nguyen et al. collected thermosteric sea level data based on temperatures in the top 700 meters of the ocean, tide gauge, satellite altimetry, and ocean reanalysis data. They used a series of sophisticated multivariate statistical techniques and ultimately produced the graphic below (Figure 2). Like you, we look at this graphic and see a global increase in sea level of approximately 80 mm over the 54-year time period. The math is simple – the graph shows a rise of 1.48 mm yr−1."

(http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/05/06/slower-sea-level-rise/#more-323)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>citizenwells:</p>
<p>&#8220;The second article also appears in Global and Planetary Change and was prepared by a team of French oceanographers. As their title suggests, Berge-Nguyen et al. collected thermosteric sea level data based on temperatures in the top 700 meters of the ocean, tide gauge, satellite altimetry, and ocean reanalysis data. They used a series of sophisticated multivariate statistical techniques and ultimately produced the graphic below (Figure 2). Like you, we look at this graphic and see a global increase in sea level of approximately 80 mm over the 54-year time period. The math is simple – the graph shows a rise of 1.48 mm yr−1.&#8221;</p>
<p>(http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2008/05/06/slower-sea-level-rise/#more-323)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizenwells</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-9843</link>
		<dc:creator>citizenwells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-9843</guid>
		<description>Question.
I realize that 20 years in the history of the earth is a incredibly
short time. Has there been any measured change in the sea level from 1989
to the present?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question.<br />
I realize that 20 years in the history of the earth is a incredibly<br />
short time. Has there been any measured change in the sea level from 1989<br />
to the present?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Jones</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-9076</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-9076</guid>
		<description>Doc G.,

What's your take on the oceanic oscillations which correlate so well with the temperature ups and downs of the last century? Do you consider the PDO/AMO cycles to be solar-driven as well, or do you regard the correlation as coincidental?

Also, what do you think of the accuracy of the recent measurements and the reliability of the usually suspect proxies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doc G.,</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your take on the oceanic oscillations which correlate so well with the temperature ups and downs of the last century? Do you consider the PDO/AMO cycles to be solar-driven as well, or do you regard the correlation as coincidental?</p>
<p>Also, what do you think of the accuracy of the recent measurements and the reliability of the usually suspect proxies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamborineman</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-9032</link>
		<dc:creator>tamborineman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 05:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-9032</guid>
		<description>Ed Darrell, they're not only ignoring history, they're adjusting and rewriting it!

Anthony, great stuff!
In spite of one of the coolest summers I can ever recall [I haven't been sailing for 4 months] the local MSM still preach AGW.
When's the class action gonna start?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed Darrell, they&#8217;re not only ignoring history, they&#8217;re adjusting and rewriting it!</p>
<p>Anthony, great stuff!<br />
In spite of one of the coolest summers I can ever recall [I haven't been sailing for 4 months] the local MSM still preach AGW.<br />
When&#8217;s the class action gonna start?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Illis</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-9009</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Illis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 00:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-9009</guid>
		<description>If you are doing any analysis with the USHCN database, remember that the historical temperature record has been adjusted to increase the trend by 0.53F up to 1999 (we don't how much they have adjusted the trend after 1999.)

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/ushcn/ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are doing any analysis with the USHCN database, remember that the historical temperature record has been adjusted to increase the trend by 0.53F up to 1999 (we don&#8217;t how much they have adjusted the trend after 1999.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/ushcn/ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/img/climate/research/ushcn/ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Jones</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-8954</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 15:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-8954</guid>
		<description>Great clips, Rev. Most amusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great clips, Rev. Most amusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Darrell</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-8803</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-8803</guid>
		<description>Certainly we need to look at history -- and I'm reluctant to say it's the climate change side that is ignoring history.  I'm not sure that these charts support a claim that current warming is incidental, as I've argued at 
http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/icebergs-in-florida-history-anecdotes-or-data/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly we need to look at history &#8212; and I&#8217;m reluctant to say it&#8217;s the climate change side that is ignoring history.  I&#8217;m not sure that these charts support a claim that current warming is incidental, as I&#8217;ve argued at<br />
<a href="http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/icebergs-in-florida-history-anecdotes-or-data/" rel="nofollow">http://timpanogos.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/icebergs-in-florida-history-anecdotes-or-data/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Gerhard Loebert</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-8777</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Gerhard Loebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-8777</guid>
		<description>The true cause of the 70-years cyclic climate changes is the modulation of the thermonuclear energy conversion process within the core of the Sun by the action of galactic vacuum density waves on this star (see below).

 A Compilation of the Arguments that Irrefutably Prove that Climate Change is driven by Solar Activity and not by CO2 Emission

Dr. Gerhard Löbert, Otterweg 48, 85598 Baldham, Germany. March 6, 2008.
Physicist. Recipient of The Needle of Honor of German Aeronautics.
Program Manager  "CCV, F 104G" (see Internet). 
Program Manager  "Lampyridae, MRMF" (see Internet)
Conveyor of a super-Einsteinian theory of gravitation that explains, among many other post-Einstein-effects, the Sun-Earth-Connection and the true cause of the global climate changes.


I. Climatological facts

As the glaciological and tree ring evidence shows, climate change is a natural phenomenon that has occurred many times in the past, both with the magnitude as well as with the time rate of temperature change that have occurred in the recent decades. The following facts prove that the recent global warming is not man-made but is a natural phenomenon.

1. In the temperature trace of the past 10 000 years based on glaciological evidence, the recent decades have not displayed any anomalous behaviour. In two-thirds of these 10 000 years, the mean temperature was even higher than today. Shortly before the last ice age the temperature in Greenland even increased by 15 degrees C in only 20 years. All of this without any man-made CO2 emission!

2. There is no direct connection between CO2 emission and climate warming. This is shown by the fact that these two physical quantities have displayed an entirely different temporal behaviour in the past 150 years. Whereas the mean global temperature varied in a quasi-periodic manner, with a mean period of 70 years, the CO2 concentration has been increasing exponentially since the 1950's. The sea level has been rising and the glaciers have been shortening practically linearly from 1850 onwards. Neither time trace showed any reaction to the sudden increase of hydrocarbon burning from the 1950's onwards.  

3. The hypothesis that the global warming of the past decades is man-made is based on the results of calculations with climate models in which the main influence on climate is not included. The most important climate driver (besides solar luminosity) comes from the interplay of solar activity, interplanetary magnetic field strength, cosmic radiation intensity, and cloud cover of the Earth atmosphere. As is shown in Section II, this phenomenon is generated by the action of galactic vacuum density waves on the core of the Sun.

4. The extremely close correlation between the changes in the mean global temperature and the small changes in the rotational velocity of the Earth in the past 150 years (see Fig. 2.2 of  www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm), which has been ignored by the mainstream climatologists, leaves little room for a human influence on climate. This close correlation results from the action of galactic vacuum density waves on the Sun and on the Earth (see Section II). Note that temperature lags rotation by 6 years.

5. From the steady decrease of the rotational velocity of the Earth that set in in  Dec. 2003, it can reliably be concluded that the mean Earth temperature will decrease again in 2010 for the duration of three decades as it did from 1872 to 1913 and from 1942 to 1972. 

6. The RSS AMSU satellite measurements show that the global temperature has not increased since 2001 despite the enormous worldwide CO2 emissions. Since 2006 it has been decreasing again.

II. Physical explanation for the strong correlation between fluctuations of the rotational velocity and changes of the mean surface temperature of the Earth

Despite its great successes, the gravitational theory of the great physicist Albert Einstein, General Relativity, (which is of a purely geometric nature and is totally incompatible with the highly successful quantum theory) must be discarded because this theory is completely irreconcilable with the extremely large energy density of the vacuum that has been accurately measured in the Casimir experiment.

Seaon Theory, a new theory of gravitation based on quantum mechanics that was developed eight decades after General Relativity, not only covers the well-known Einstein-effects but also shows up half a dozen post-Einstein effects that occur in nature. From a humanitarian standpoint, the most important super-Einsteinian physical phenomenon is the generation of small-amplitude longitudinal gravitational waves by the motion of the supermassive bodies located at the center of our galaxy, their transmission throughout the Galaxy, and the action of these waves on the Sun, the Earth and the other celestial bodies through which they pass. These vacuum density waves, which carry with them small changes in the electromagnetic properties of the vacuum, occur in an extremely large period range from minutes to millennia.

On the Sun, these vacuum waves modulate the intensity of the thermonuclear energy conversion process within the core, and this has its effect on all physical quantities of the Sun (this is called solar activity). This in turn has its influences on the Earth and the other planets. In particular, the solar wind and the solar magnetic field strength are modulated which results in large changes in the intensity of the cosmic radiation reaching the Earth. Cosmic rays produce condensation nuclei so that the cloud cover of the atmosphere and the Earth albedo also change. 

On the Earth, the steady stream of vacuum density waves produces parts-per-billion changes in a large number of geophysical quantities. The most important quantities are the radius, circumference, rotational velocity, gravitational acceleration, VLBI baseline lengths, and axis orientation angles of the Earth, as well as the orbital elements of all low-earth-orbit satellites. All of these fluctuations have been measured.   

Irrefutable evidence for the existence of this new, super-Einsteinian wave type is provided by the extremely close correlation between changes of the mean temperature and fluctuations of the mean rotational velocity of the Earth. (see the figure referred to in Section I.4). Einsteinian theory cannot explain this amazing correlation between two physical quantities that seem to be completely unrelated.   

While the rotational velocity of the Earth and the thermonuclear energy conversion process on the Sun react simultaneously to the passage of a vacuum density wave, a time span of 6 years is needed for the energy to be transported from the core of the Sun to the Earth's atmosphere and for the latter's reaction time. 

As can be seen, super-Einsteinian gravitation reveals the true cause of climate change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The true cause of the 70-years cyclic climate changes is the modulation of the thermonuclear energy conversion process within the core of the Sun by the action of galactic vacuum density waves on this star (see below).</p>
<p> A Compilation of the Arguments that Irrefutably Prove that Climate Change is driven by Solar Activity and not by CO2 Emission</p>
<p>Dr. Gerhard Löbert, Otterweg 48, 85598 Baldham, Germany. March 6, 2008.<br />
Physicist. Recipient of The Needle of Honor of German Aeronautics.<br />
Program Manager  &#8220;CCV, F 104G&#8221; (see Internet).<br />
Program Manager  &#8220;Lampyridae, MRMF&#8221; (see Internet)<br />
Conveyor of a super-Einsteinian theory of gravitation that explains, among many other post-Einstein-effects, the Sun-Earth-Connection and the true cause of the global climate changes.</p>
<p>I. Climatological facts</p>
<p>As the glaciological and tree ring evidence shows, climate change is a natural phenomenon that has occurred many times in the past, both with the magnitude as well as with the time rate of temperature change that have occurred in the recent decades. The following facts prove that the recent global warming is not man-made but is a natural phenomenon.</p>
<p>1. In the temperature trace of the past 10 000 years based on glaciological evidence, the recent decades have not displayed any anomalous behaviour. In two-thirds of these 10 000 years, the mean temperature was even higher than today. Shortly before the last ice age the temperature in Greenland even increased by 15 degrees C in only 20 years. All of this without any man-made CO2 emission!</p>
<p>2. There is no direct connection between CO2 emission and climate warming. This is shown by the fact that these two physical quantities have displayed an entirely different temporal behaviour in the past 150 years. Whereas the mean global temperature varied in a quasi-periodic manner, with a mean period of 70 years, the CO2 concentration has been increasing exponentially since the 1950&#8217;s. The sea level has been rising and the glaciers have been shortening practically linearly from 1850 onwards. Neither time trace showed any reaction to the sudden increase of hydrocarbon burning from the 1950&#8217;s onwards.  </p>
<p>3. The hypothesis that the global warming of the past decades is man-made is based on the results of calculations with climate models in which the main influence on climate is not included. The most important climate driver (besides solar luminosity) comes from the interplay of solar activity, interplanetary magnetic field strength, cosmic radiation intensity, and cloud cover of the Earth atmosphere. As is shown in Section II, this phenomenon is generated by the action of galactic vacuum density waves on the core of the Sun.</p>
<p>4. The extremely close correlation between the changes in the mean global temperature and the small changes in the rotational velocity of the Earth in the past 150 years (see Fig. 2.2 of  <a href="http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y2787E/y2787e03.htm</a>), which has been ignored by the mainstream climatologists, leaves little room for a human influence on climate. This close correlation results from the action of galactic vacuum density waves on the Sun and on the Earth (see Section II). Note that temperature lags rotation by 6 years.</p>
<p>5. From the steady decrease of the rotational velocity of the Earth that set in in  Dec. 2003, it can reliably be concluded that the mean Earth temperature will decrease again in 2010 for the duration of three decades as it did from 1872 to 1913 and from 1942 to 1972. </p>
<p>6. The RSS AMSU satellite measurements show that the global temperature has not increased since 2001 despite the enormous worldwide CO2 emissions. Since 2006 it has been decreasing again.</p>
<p>II. Physical explanation for the strong correlation between fluctuations of the rotational velocity and changes of the mean surface temperature of the Earth</p>
<p>Despite its great successes, the gravitational theory of the great physicist Albert Einstein, General Relativity, (which is of a purely geometric nature and is totally incompatible with the highly successful quantum theory) must be discarded because this theory is completely irreconcilable with the extremely large energy density of the vacuum that has been accurately measured in the Casimir experiment.</p>
<p>Seaon Theory, a new theory of gravitation based on quantum mechanics that was developed eight decades after General Relativity, not only covers the well-known Einstein-effects but also shows up half a dozen post-Einstein effects that occur in nature. From a humanitarian standpoint, the most important super-Einsteinian physical phenomenon is the generation of small-amplitude longitudinal gravitational waves by the motion of the supermassive bodies located at the center of our galaxy, their transmission throughout the Galaxy, and the action of these waves on the Sun, the Earth and the other celestial bodies through which they pass. These vacuum density waves, which carry with them small changes in the electromagnetic properties of the vacuum, occur in an extremely large period range from minutes to millennia.</p>
<p>On the Sun, these vacuum waves modulate the intensity of the thermonuclear energy conversion process within the core, and this has its effect on all physical quantities of the Sun (this is called solar activity). This in turn has its influences on the Earth and the other planets. In particular, the solar wind and the solar magnetic field strength are modulated which results in large changes in the intensity of the cosmic radiation reaching the Earth. Cosmic rays produce condensation nuclei so that the cloud cover of the atmosphere and the Earth albedo also change. </p>
<p>On the Earth, the steady stream of vacuum density waves produces parts-per-billion changes in a large number of geophysical quantities. The most important quantities are the radius, circumference, rotational velocity, gravitational acceleration, VLBI baseline lengths, and axis orientation angles of the Earth, as well as the orbital elements of all low-earth-orbit satellites. All of these fluctuations have been measured.   </p>
<p>Irrefutable evidence for the existence of this new, super-Einsteinian wave type is provided by the extremely close correlation between changes of the mean temperature and fluctuations of the mean rotational velocity of the Earth. (see the figure referred to in Section I.4). Einsteinian theory cannot explain this amazing correlation between two physical quantities that seem to be completely unrelated.   </p>
<p>While the rotational velocity of the Earth and the thermonuclear energy conversion process on the Sun react simultaneously to the passage of a vacuum density wave, a time span of 6 years is needed for the energy to be transported from the core of the Sun to the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere and for the latter&#8217;s reaction time. </p>
<p>As can be seen, super-Einsteinian gravitation reveals the true cause of climate change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Change = Hogwash? &#171; The Manchild Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/03/20/deja-vu-all-over-again-climate-worries-today-also-happened-in-the-20s-and-30s/#comment-8748</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Change = Hogwash? &#171; The Manchild Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/?p=907#comment-8748</guid>
		<description>[...] specifically, I&#8217;m writing this in response to What&#8217;s up with that?&#8217;s post on climate trends being recognized in the early post-industrial era of the 1920&#8217;s and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] specifically, I&#8217;m writing this in response to What&#8217;s up with that?&#8217;s post on climate trends being recognized in the early post-industrial era of the 1920&#8217;s and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
